A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

How Your Students Can Get You Fired

Those of us who teach remotely controversial topics now have reasons to be more alarmed. It appears that a group of graduate students at the University of Kansas succeeded at having their professor relieved of her teaching duties for mentioning (not using) the N-word during a class discussion on race. I will explain the difference between mentioning and using later, but first here are basic details of this case:


During the seminar, the (white) professor was asked about racial issues on campus. According to the students, she responded as follows: “As a white woman I just never have seen the racism…It’s not like I see [the N-word] spray painted on walls…” As the professor explained later on, she wanted to point out that as a white woman she had a limited exposure to instances of racism on campus.


The students, who said that “this utterance caused shock and disbelief,” demand the professor’s dismissal in an open later published online. Lest the professor’s utterance was not good reason to fire her, the students also complained that she exhibited “a lack of empathy and care for students of color who are facing academic struggles” and demonstrated “her lack of awareness of racial discrimination and violence on this campus and elsewhere.”


While the case is still pending, the professor had to relinquish her teaching duties. The case’s possible implication is alarming for faculty (particularly part-time faculty) to say the least.


First, the students in Kansas claim that the “lack of awareness of racial discrimination” and her “lack of empathy” are fireable offenses. The implication of the vague term lack of awareness is undoubtedly troubling.


Second, the case suggests that it is pretty easy to suspend an instructor for simply mentioning racially charged words. If, like me, you happen to teach any historical text that mentions such words, you have to feel the pressure of censorship and the threat of being fired. I do. In one of my courses on early American culture, for example, we examine people’s religious and racial prejudices: anti-Catholic propaganda and pamphlets’ defending slavery, to name just two subjects. In my literature courses, we read Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Heart of Darkness, whose main characters have a habit of using the N-word repeatedly. What the Kansas case reminds me is that one day I (and you) might very well be fired for simply referring students to these texts. The distinction between mentioning (arguably permissible in academic discourse) and using racially charged words (strictly prohibited for good reasons) is no longer important for some of our students who appear to react to words with the Pavlovian reflex. And as you know, it only takes one student to get the ball rolling.


I encourage everyone to keep an eye on this case.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share Post

1 comment to How Your Students Can Get You Fired

  • Yves Cloarec

    Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.
    I taught High School back in 2010 and had to take Huckleberry Finn off the 12th grade reading list because parents didn’t want their children traumatized by an encounter with the repeated use of the word. I tried to argue that words only have the powers that we ascribe to them: the “This is not a pipe” argument. Not only was the attempt futile, I was ordered by the Principal to remove the book from the list, and to apologize to the parents for my insensitivity.

    There are several aspects of the Kansas case which are disturbing and—while I do not read any malice or even insensitivity into the Kansas professor’s words—even IF we were to assume she has a racist world-view, my answer would still be the quote attributed to Voltaire “I wholly disapprove of what you say—but will defend to my death your right to say it.” Censorship anywhere is a disgrace; in the context of an institution of higher learning it is an abomination. And it matters not that the censorship is condoned by a majority, or that it is well-meaning: facilis descensus Inferno… the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.